Head to head
Cody by Sourcegraph vs Cursor
Side-by-side comparison of two leading AI coding tools. Updated 2026-06-25.
Quick Verdict
Cody by Sourcegraph is best for large enterprises, while Cursor is ideal for individual developers. Cursor is more affordable starting at $0/mo.
| Feature | Cody by Sourcegraph | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $59/mo | Free |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, CA |
| Best For | Large enterprises, Teams with massive codebases, Organizations needing code search, Regulated industries | Individual developers, AI-first workflow adopters, Full-stack developers, Rapid prototyping |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Limitations | Enterprise-only (no individual plans); Expensive for small teams; Annual contract required | Usage credits can run out quickly; Newer product, still evolving; Not ideal for large enterprise |
| Affiliate Commission | No affiliate program | No affiliate program |
Try Cody by Sourcegraph
Start free trial →
Try Cursor
Start free →
Keep comparing
More comparisons
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Cody by Sourcegraph or Cursor cheaper?
Cursor is cheaper, starting at $0/mo, versus $59/mo for Cody by Sourcegraph.
What is the main difference between Cody by Sourcegraph and Cursor?
Cody by Sourcegraph is best for large enterprises, while Cursor is ideal for individual developers. See the feature table above for a full side-by-side.
Does Cody by Sourcegraph or Cursor have a free plan?
Cursor offers a free plan; Cody by Sourcegraph does not.
Which is better, Cody by Sourcegraph or Cursor?
Neither wins outright — it depends on your use case. Choose Cody by Sourcegraph for large enterprises, or Cursor for individual developers. Both are compared in detail above.