Head to head
Cursor vs Cody by Sourcegraph
Side-by-side comparison of two leading AI coding tools. Updated 2026-06-25.
Quick Verdict
Cursor is best for individual developers, while Cody by Sourcegraph is ideal for large enterprises. Cursor is more affordable starting at $0/mo.
| Feature | Cursor | Cody by Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Free | $59/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, CA |
| Best For | Individual developers, AI-first workflow adopters, Full-stack developers, Rapid prototyping | Large enterprises, Teams with massive codebases, Organizations needing code search, Regulated industries |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Limitations | Usage credits can run out quickly; Newer product, still evolving; Not ideal for large enterprise | Enterprise-only (no individual plans); Expensive for small teams; Annual contract required |
| Affiliate Commission | No affiliate program | No affiliate program |
Try Cursor
Start free →
Try Cody by Sourcegraph
Start free trial →
Keep comparing
More comparisons
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor or Cody by Sourcegraph cheaper?
Cursor is cheaper, starting at $0/mo, versus $59/mo for Cody by Sourcegraph.
What is the main difference between Cursor and Cody by Sourcegraph?
Cursor is best for individual developers, while Cody by Sourcegraph is ideal for large enterprises. See the feature table above for a full side-by-side.
Does Cursor or Cody by Sourcegraph have a free plan?
Cursor offers a free plan; Cody by Sourcegraph does not.
Which is better, Cursor or Cody by Sourcegraph?
Neither wins outright — it depends on your use case. Choose Cursor for individual developers, or Cody by Sourcegraph for large enterprises. Both are compared in detail above.